Evaluation of anxiolytic effect of combination of tramadol with gabapentin and pregabalin in Wistar rats

Background: Anxiety is a widespread disorder that approximately 18% of the population experience at some stage in their lives. Pain is a common stimulus that induces anxiety in both animals and human beings. Combination of drugs with good anti-anxiety and analgesic effect can be used for the treatment of chronic pain induced anxiety, post-operative, and procedure-related pain-induced anxiety. Aims and Objectives: The study was conducted to evaluate the anxiolytic activity of combination of gabapentin with tramadol, pregabalin with tramadol compared to standard fluoxetine, in elevated plus maze (EPM) and light-dark arena (LDA) models of anxiety in Wistar albino rats. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four male or female albino Wistar rats from Central Animal House, MRMC, Kalaburagi, were utilized. Fluoxetine 10 mg/kg, gabapentin 30 mg/kg, tramadol 30 mg/kg, and pregabalin 30 mg/kg were used. Eddy’s hot plate method used for inducing anxiety. EPM and LDA models were used to study the effect of drugs in reducing the pain and anxiety. Results: The present study showed that the exposure to hot plate induces pain, creates anxiety, and reduces locomotor and explorative activity among the rats when exposed to hot plate. There was reduction in anxiety after drug administration, in fluoxetine and gabapentin with tramadol groups with >75% increase in entry into the light chamber or open arm at least once or more during the time period of 5 min when compared to hot plate post-exposure readings. Whereas in pregabalin and tramadol group, it was observed that 25% increase in entry of rats into open arm at least once during the time period of 5 min and 25% decrease in entry of rats into light chamber as compared to those rats after exposure to hot plate. Conclusion: Our study has demonstrated that tramadol, pregabalin, and gabapentin have got analgesic as well as anti-anxiety effects in rats when given in combination. All these experimental data, together with the previous experimental studies and the results reported in this work, suggest that combination of these drugs could be more effective in treating anxiety-related disorders such as chronic pain, pain-induced anxiety, post-operative, and procedure-related pain-induced anxiety with minimal side effects. Further dose ranging studies and models might be necessary to better understand the effects of these drugs in combination.

Comparative study of epidural fentanyl with bupivacaine and epidural tramadol with bupivacaine for postoperative pain management in orthopedic lower limb surgeries

Introduction: Pain is a complex subjective sensation that is difficult to quantify in a repeatable manner. Surgical pain is observed to be more intense post-surgery and then fades in the next 24 h. Epidural anesthesia/analgesia is the most widely used technique for lower limb surgeries because of its good sensory and motor block property, reduces stress response, and maintains sufficient spontaneous respiration and hemodynamic stability. Materials and Methods: The study looked at 100 individuals between the ages of 20 and 60 who underwent elective lower limb surgery and were classified as ASA I and II. The patients were split into two 50-person groups. The adverse effects of nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, urine retention, and pruritus, as well as the quality and duration of postoperative analgesia, were investigated. The patient was monitored for 48 h after surgery. Results: A total of 100 patients were included in the study, where the least age of the patient was 19 years and the greatest age was 75 years. In group T, maximum patients belong to the age group of 26–35 years, whereas in group F maximum patients belong to the age group of 36–45years. In group T, 41 (82%) were males and 9 (18%) were females. In group F, 37 (74%) were males and 13 (26%) were females. Conclusion: Our findings show that epidural tramadol and epidural fentanyl are equally effective, except for fentanyl’s shorter duration of action. Fentanyl also has a moderate sedative effect, which is beneficial in the postoperative period.

Low-Dose Tramadol-Induced Seizure: A Case Report

Tramadol is a weak mu (µ) opioid receptor agonist that acts by inhibiting serotonin and norepinephrine uptake. Tramadol undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism by a number of pathways, including CYP2D6 and CYP3A4, and by conjugation with subsequent renal excretion. The maximum recommended dose is 400 mg/day. One of the most important adverse effects of tramadol is a seizure, which usually occurs at high doses and is often generalized tonic–clonic type and self-limiting. Here, we present a case of a patient with inflammatory low backache who developed seizures while on low-dose oral tramadol. After 1 h of taking the first tablet of tramadol, he developed morbilliform rashes all over the body. One day later, he developed generalized tonic–clonic seizures followed by a loss of consciousness for 5 min. The patient was admitted to the hospital and managed conservatively with injection lorazepam and tramadol was stopped. In general, if applied in overdose, tramadol can only incite seizures in patients already suffering from some sort of disorder related to seizures or if it is administered along with antidepressants, alcohol, etc. But here, only with the use of 37.5 mg oral application, the incidence of seizure happened.

Pentazocine versus tramadol-paracetamol combination as analgesia in labor: A randomized controlled trial

Objectives: Labor should be a satisfactory experience and effective pain management should be employed as recommended by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. In developing countries, pain management in labor is still a big challenge and the search for the ultimate labor analgesia is still ongoing. The objectives of the study were to determine whether the synergistic analgesic effect of the combination of tramadol and paracetamol will produce analgesia comparable to pentazocine with a better side effect profile. Material and Methods: This was a randomized controlled, double-blinded trial of tramadol-paracetamol combination versus pentazocine as labor analgesia and was carried out at the University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Abuja, between June 2018 and March 2019. A total of 218 eligible parturients recruited at term, were counseled on labor analgesia, its benefits, and the options made available to them and educated on the pain scoring system. Parturients were allocated into two groups using computer-generated numbers with the WINPEPI software. Group A was given tramadol-paracetamol combination, while Group B received pentazocine, both at standard doses. Hourly pain scores, APGAR scores, labor duration, patients' satisfaction, and side effects were collated. The level of significance was set at <0.05. Results: Tramadol-paracetamol was administered to 109 (50.9%) while pentazocine was administered to105 (49.1%) of the study participants. The mean age in the tramadol-paracetamol group was 29.6 ± 4.8 years, and in the pentazocine group, it was 28.8 ± 4.5 years. The difference in pain scores on the visual analog scale was statistically significant at the 3rd and 4th h (P = 0.02 and 0.004), but not significant in the 1st and 2nd h (P = 0.05 and 0.22) in the two groups. Overall, the average pain score in the tramadol-paracetamol group was significantly higher compared to the pentazocine group (5.27 ± 1.86 vs. 4.72 ± 1.54; P = 0.02). The 1st and 5th min APGAR scores (P = 0.44 and 0.67, respectively) of neonates in the tramadol-paracetamol and pentazocine groups were comparable. Nausea and drowsiness occurred more frequently in the pentazocine group at P-values of 0.047 and 0.0015, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the duration of labor between the tramadol-paracetamol and pentazocine groups. not statistically significant, a higher proportion of parturients in the pentazocine group was satisfied compared with the tramadol-paracetamol group (71.4% vs. 63.3%; P = 0.13).Conclusion: This study showed that intravenous pentazocine provides better pain relief in labor, but the tramadol-paracetamol combination has fewer side effects

Managing acute opioid withdrawal with tramadol during COVID-19 lockdown in a peri-urban setting

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has highlighted the scope of heroin dependence and need for evidence-based treatment amongst marginalised people in South Africa. Acute opioid withdrawal management without maintenance therapy carries risks of increased morbidity and mortality. Due to the high costs of methadone, Tshwane's Community Oriented Substance Use Programme (COSUP) used tramadol for opioid withdrawal management during the initial COVID-19 response. Aim: To describe demographics, route of heroin administration and medication-related experiences amongst people accessing tramadol for treatment of opioid withdrawal.Setting: Three community-based COSUP sites in Mamelodi (Tshwane, South Africa). Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were collected using an interviewer-administered paper-based tool between April and August 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse data. Results: Of the 220 service users initiated onto tramadol, almost half (n = 104, 47%) were not contactable. Fifty-eight (26%) people participated, amongst whom most were male (n = 55, 95%). Participants' median age was 32 years. Most participants injected heroin (n = 36, 62.1%). Most participants experienced at least one side effect (n = 47, 81%) with 37 (64%) experiencing two or more side effects from tramadol. Insomnia occurred most frequently (n = 26, 45%). One person without a history of seizures experienced a seizure. Opioid withdrawal symptoms were experienced by 54 participants (93%) whilst taking tramadol. Over half (n = 38, 66%) reported using less heroin whilst on tramadol. Conclusion: Tramadol reduced heroin use but was associated with withdrawal symptoms and unfavourable side effects. Findings point to the limitations of tramadol as opioid withdrawal management to retain people in care and the importance of access to first-line opioid agonists.

Kounis Syndrome: Case Report in Goiânia/BR

Abstract 22-year-old male patient with no heart disease, who was given an ambulatory medication with analgesics due to an acute renal crisis. After the drug administration, the patient presented dyspnea, cyanosis, and hemoptysis. There was suspicion of anaphylactic shock, which was treated, but there was no improvement in the clinical condition. The patient was referred to the Intensive Care Unit, where tests were performed showing elevated cardiac enzymes and Immunoglobulin E and Computed Tomography of Thoracic revealed alveolar hemorrhage. He developed clinical worsening and died after sepsis. The final diagnosis was of kounis syndrome due to the hypersensitivity reaction to the analgesics introduced in the patient, generating an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The purpose of this case report was to highlight a syndrome that is little reported because it is not part of the differential diagnosis routines of ACS, but it generates important complications.

Valoración del riego de adicción a tramadol en pacientes con dolor crónico no oncológico / Risk of addiction in patients with tramadol for chronic no cáncer pain

RESUMEN Objetivo El manejo del dolor crónico no oncológico con analgésicos opioides ha sido de importancia para el control de los síntomas y el restablecimiento de la actividad. Sin embargo, el riesgo de adicción asociado a estos medicamentos es ampliamente conocido y evaluado. Este estudio evalúa el riesgo de adicción que presentaban los pacientes con manejo de tramadol describiendo los factores más frecuentes en la muestra estudiada frente a lo reportado en la literatura. Métodos Una muestra de 76 pacientes de una clínica de dolor que están en manejo con tramadol se les administra un cuestionario con características demográficas y con la escala Opioid Risk Tool para el riesgo de adicción. Resultados El 57,89% de los sujetos fueron mujeres; el 55,20% se encontraba entre los 29 y 59 años. El riesgo de adicción moderado se encontró en el 9,09% de las mujeres y en el 37,05% de los hombres. La inclusión de otras enfermedades como ansiedad y trastorno de estrés postraumático aumenta el riesgo de adicción a severo en 6,06% de los hombres. Conclusiones La valoración del riesgo de adicción a opioides debe tener en cuenta los factores encontrados en la población colombiana.

ABSTRACT Objective The management of chronic non-cancer pain with opioid analgesics has been important for the control of symptoms and the restoration of activity, however, the risk of addiction associated with these drugs is widely known. This study evaluates the risk of addiction presented by patients with tramadol treatment, describing the most frequent factors in the sample studied compared to what was reported in the literature. Methods A sample of 76 patients from a pain clinic who are being managed with tramadol are administered a questionnaire with demographic characteristics and with the Opioid Risk Tool scale for the risk of addiction. Results 57.89% of the subjects were women, 55.20% were affected between 29 and 59 years. A moderate risk of addiction was found in 9.09% of women and 37.05% of men. The inclusion of other diseases such as anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder increases the risk of addiction to severe in 6.06% of men. Conclusions The assessment of the risk of addiction to opioids must consider the factors found in the Colombian population.

Safety and efficacy of "on-demand" tramadol in patients with premature ejaculation: an updated meta-analysis

ABSTRACT Introduction: Tramadol has been used for the treatment of premature ejaculation, however, the studies published for the same are not well designed. The primary objective of this study was to explore the literature pertaining to the use of tramadol in patients with PE to determine its safety and efficacy in this population. Materials ande methods: Systematic literature search of various electronic databases was conducted to include all the randomized studies and quasi-randomized studies. Standard PRISMA (Preferred reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis) guidelines were pursued for this review and study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019123381). Results: Out of 9 studies included in this review, 5 were randomized controlled trials, and rests of the 4 studies were quasi-randomized studies. Tramadol resulted in significantly higher improvement of IELT with the mean difference (MD) of 139.6 seconds and confidence interval (CI) 106.5-172.6 seconds with a p-value of p <0.00001. All dosages except 25mg fared well as compared to placebo. Tramadol fared better than placebo at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after initiation of therapy as compared to the placebo. Tramadol group had reported a significantly higher number of adverse events with treatment as compared to placebo but none of them were serious. Conclusion: Tramadol appears to be an effective drug for the management of PE with a low propensity for serious adverse events. However, evidence obtained from this study is of low to moderate quality. Furthermore, effective dose and duration of therapy remain elusive.

Evaluación del efecto analgésico transoperatorio del tramadol comparado con la lidocaína en caninos oncológico / Assessment of the adverse effect of tramadol compared to lidocaine in the oncologic intraoperative in canines

Introducción: El estudio y tratamiento del dolor ha sido una de las preocupaciones más importantes en los últimos 30 años en el ámbito médico mundial. Desde hace varias décadas a nivel internacional se realizan estudios sobre el efecto del tramadol y la lidocaína como analgésicos intraoperatorio, con el fin de obtener una adecuada analgesia durante el procedimiento quirúrgico y el periodo posoperatorio inmediato. Objetivo: Comparar el efecto analgésico del tramadol y la lidocaína durante el período transoperatorio en caninos programados para intervención quirúrgica. Método: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo, comparativo, con animales programados para tratamiento quirúrgico por presentar tumores periféricos. Se incluyeron 10 animales divididos en 2 grupos. El grupo control (G-C) que recibió lidocaína sin preservo (lidocaína SP) en infusión continua durante el procedimiento quirúrgico y el grupo 1 (G-1) que se le administró tramadol endovenoso previo al acto quirúrgico. Se evaluaron variables hemodinámicas y de oxigenación como indicadores indirectos de dolor transoperatorio. Resultados: La muestra fue homogénea para la edad y el sexo. El comportamiento de las variables hemodinámicas resultó más estable durante la infusión de lidocaína. La saturación periférica de oxígeno fue similar con ambos medicamentos, así como la temperatura. Conclusiones: La infusión intravenosa de lidocaína SP durante el periodo transoperatorio en caninos oncológico demostró una mejor efectividad analgésica en comparación con el tramadol aplicado preoperatoriamente, según los parámetros evaluados(AU)

Introduction: Study and treatment of pain has been one of the most important concerns in the last thirty years in the worldwide medical field. For several decades, international studies have been carried out on the effect of tramadol and lidocaine as intraoperative analgesics, in order to achieve adequate analgesia during surgical procedures and the immediate postoperative period. Objective: To compare the analgesic effect of tramadol and lidocaine during the intraoperative period in canines scheduled for surgical intervention. Method: A prospective, comparative study was carried out with animals scheduled for surgical treatment due to peripheral tumors. Ten animals were included, divided into two groups: the control group, which received lidocaine without preservation in continuous infusion during the surgical procedure, and group 1, which was administered intravenous tramadol prior to the surgical act. Hemodynamic and oxygenation variables were assessed as indirect indicators of intraoperative pain. Results: The sample was homogeneous for age and sex. The behavior of the hemodynamic variables was more stable during the lidocaine infusion. Peripheral oxygen saturation was similar in both drugs, as well as temperature. Conclusions: Intravenous infusion of lidocaine without preservation during the intraoperative period in oncological canines showed better analgesic effectiveness compared to tramadol applied preoperatively, according to the parameters assessed(AU)

Poisoning in domestic cats in Brazil: toxicants, clinical signs, and therapeutic approaches / [Intoxicação em gatos domésticos no Brasil: toxicantes, sinais clínicos e abordagens terapêuticas]

This study evaluated the most common toxic agents affecting domestic cats, the clinical signs of toxicity, and the therapeutic approaches for recovery. A survey on poisoning in cats was conducted among small animal veterinary practitioners from 2017 to 2018. Of the 748 completed questionnaires, 543 (72.6%) were evaluated. Pesticides and household cleaning supplies were the most common causes of poisoning in cats. The toxicant groups included pesticides and household cleaning supplies (organophosphates), human drugs (acetaminophen), plants/plant derivatives (lily), and veterinary drugs (tramadol). The major clinical signs for these four groups of toxicants were (1) acetaminophen poisoning, which caused oxidative erythrocyte damage; (2) muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic syndrome, which resulted from organophosphate poisoning; (3) acute kidney injury, which resulted from intoxication of lily; and (4) serotonin syndrome, which resulted from tramadol toxicosis. Interventions for treating poisoning in cats were based on the clinical presentation of animals. In the present study, the significant toxins identified to be dangerous for cats were characterized using the obtained data in Brazil as well as the main associated clinical signs and therapy recommended by veterinarians.(AU)

Objetiva-se com este trabalho caracterizar os principais toxicantes para gatos domésticos, bem como os prevalentes sinais clínicos e a terapêutica associada. Uma pesquisa sobre envenenamento em gatos foi realizada entre médicos veterinários no período de 2017 a 2018. Dos 748 questionários preenchidos, 543 (72,6%) foram avaliados. Pesticidas e domissanitários foram os principais causadores de intoxicação em gatos. Entre os grupos tóxicos, destacaram-se, na categoria pesticidas e domissanitários (organofosforados), medicamentos humanos (acetaminofeno), plantas e derivados de planta (lírio) e medicamentos veterinários (tramadol). Os principais sinais clínicos para os quatro grupos de substâncias tóxicas foram: (1) intoxicação por acetaminofeno, que causou dano eritrocitário oxidativo; (2) síndrome colinérgica muscarínica e nicotínica, resultante do envenenamento por organofosforado; (3) lesão renal aguda, causada pela intoxicação por lírio; e (4) síndrome serotoninérgica, resultante da exposição ao tramadol. As intervenções realizadas para o tratamento dos envenenamentos foram justificáveis mediante a apresentação clínica dos animais. Por meio dos dados obtidos, puderam-se caracterizar os principais tóxicos para gatos no Brasil, bem como os principais sinais clínicos associados e a terapêutica preconizada pelos médicos veterinários.(AU)

Skills and practices of pharmacy staff for dispensing of drugs with fiscalized substances in drugstores and pharmacies

ABSTRACT OBJETIVE To evaluate the skills and practices of pharmacy staff during the dispensing of tramadol (drug with fiscalized substance) in drugstores and pharmacies in Medellin, Colombia. METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed. The simulated patient technique was used. The main outcomes included the information provided on the dispensed drug (tramadol), the use of tools to provide information, and the information provided on drug precautions and use recommendations. RESULTS We visited 305 drugstores and pharmacies. The average dispensing time was 2.3 min (SD 1.1 min). In nine drugstores and pharmacies (3.0%), tramadol was not dispensed because it was not in stock. In 17 drugstores and pharmacies (5.7%), the simulated patients were actively informed by the dispensing pharmacy staff; of these, 16 provided oral information and one provided oral and written information. Eight patients (2.7%) received information regarding tramadol use. However, 99% of patients were not informed about tramadol side effects such as dependence, sedation, or hypnosis, and none of the simulated female patients were informed on the precautions related to tramadol use during pregnancy or lactation. CONCLUSIONS Communication skills and appropriate practices of pharmacy staff are critical to patient self-care. However, this study shows their difficulty in counseling about precautions and use recommendations of drugs with fiscalized substances. These outcomes could inform future studies focusing on the rational use of these drugs in drugstores and pharmacies. It is necessary to improve the pharmacy staff competencies through continuing education programs, to facilitate access to information and training.

The comparison of effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with tramadol on intravenous analgesia and sleep quality after cesarean section / 中国医师进修杂志

Objective:To investigate the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with tramadol on intravenous analgesia and sleep quality after cesarean section.Methods:One hundred and twenty pregnant women who underwent cesarean section in Zhongshan Boai Hospital from March 2019 to July 2020 were selected. They were randomly divided into four groups, with 30 patients in each group. The patients in group Awere given patient controlled anesthesia with tramadol 800 mg+ tropisetron 5mg after cesarean section, and the patients in group B1, B2 and B3 were given 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 μg/kg dexmedetomidine on the basis of group A. The scores of exercise and rest of visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after the surgery were observed. The scores of Athens insomnia scale (AIS) before and after surgery were compared. The Ramsay sedation scores and basic vital signs were recorded, compared and analyzed at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after the surgery. The incidence of adverse reactions within 48 h after the surgery was counted in the four groups.Results:The scores of exercise and rest of VAS at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after the surgery in four groups had significant differences ( P<0.05). The scores of group A were the highest, and next were the group B1, B2 and B3. The scores of AIS at 1 and 2 d after surgery in four groups had significant differences ( P<0.05).The scores of group A were the highest, and next were the group B1, B2 and B3.The level of oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO 2) after surgery in four groups had no significant difference ( P>0.05). The levels of systolicblood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR) after surgery in four groups had significant differences ( P<0.05). The levels of SBP, DBP, HR in group A were the highest, and next were the group B1, B2 and B3. Thelevels of SBP, DBP, HR in group A, B1 and B2 were in normal range, but the levels of SBP, DBP and HR in group B3 were in lower limits of normal, the level of HR in some patients was below normal. The Ramsay sedation scores at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery in the four groups had significant differences ( P<0.05). Ramsay sedation scores in group A were the lowest, and next were the group B1, B2 and B3. The total incidence of adverse reactions in group B3 was the highest with 33.33%(10/30), and in group B1 was the lowest with 6.67%(2/30). Conclusions:Medium dose of dexmedetomidine (1.5 μg/kg) combined with tramadol has a good effect on postoperative intravenous sedation and analgesia in patients after cesarean section, which can improve the sleep quality of patients. Besides, the drug safety can be guaranteed.

Comparison of inhalational methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) and intramuscular tramadol for prehospital analgesia

INTRODUCTION@#Treatment of pain is an important component of prehospital care. Inhalational analgesia agents have attractive strengths, but there is a paucity of studies comparing these with more conventional agents. We aimed to compare inhalational methoxyflurane and intramuscular (IM) tramadol as first-contact analgesia in the Singapore national ambulance service.@*METHODS@#Ambulances were randomised to carry either methoxyflurane or IM tramadol for the first six months and crossed over to the other arm after six months. Patients aged ≥ 16 years, with acute pain arising from musculoskeletal trauma with Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score ≥ 3 were enrolled. Variables included NRS reduction, time variables, adverse effects, Ramsay Sedation Scores, and patient and paramedic satisfaction scores on a Likert scale.@*RESULTS@#A total of 369 patients were enrolled into this study, but 26 patients were excluded due to missing data. The methoxyflurane arm had a shorter median time taken from arrival at the scene to drug administration (9.0 [interquartile range 6.0-14.0] minutes vs. 11.0 [interquartile range 8.0-15.0] minutes). For patients who achieved reduction in NRS ≥ 3 within 20 minutes, those in the methoxyflurane arm took a shorter time. However, the methoxyflurane (46.7%) arm experienced lower proportion of patients not achieving NRS reduction ≥ 3 when compared to the tramadol (71.6%) arm after over 20 minutes. The methoxyflurane arm had significantly higher paramedic and patient satisfaction scores.@*CONCLUSION@#For the doses of medication used in this implementation study, methoxyflurane was superior in efficacy, speed of onset and administration, but had more minor adverse effects when compared to IM tramadol.

Comparison of analgesic efficacy of intramuscular tramadol and pethidine in labour

Background: Labour pain is among the most severe pain experienced by women. It is unpleasant and distressing to the parturient. The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intramuscular tramadol and pethidine in labour. Methods: The prospective study conducted in SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Department of OBG, from December 2013 to November 2014. The study was a study of the parturients admitted in the labour theatre. Written and informed consent was taken from all the patients enrolled in the study. One hundred parturient at term in active labour were randomly assigned to one of the two groups to receive intramuscularly either tramadol 100 mg or pethidine 75 mg. Results: Results were comparable in terms of maternal age, maternal weight and neonatal weight. Proportion of cases with satisfactory to good pain relief was 74% in the tramadol group and 78% in the pethidine group. Nausea and/or vomiting (12% versus 8%), fatigue (6% versus 4%) and drowsiness (8% versus 4%) were significantly high in the pethidine group than the tramadol group(p<0.05). The drugs used did not appear to influence the mode of delivery. Proportion of cases with non-reassuring foetal heart rate was high in the pethidine group. Meconium stained liquor was equally seen in both the groups and there were no incidence of neonatal respiratory depression in any of the groups.Conclusion: Tramadol is an equally effective labour analgesic as pethidine with less maternal and perinatal side effects.

Comparative study of fentanyl versus tramadol as adjuvant with low dose local anaesthetic ropivacaine (0.1%) for epidural labour analgesia

Background: Toxonomy committee of International Association defined pain as an unpleasant emotional and sensory experience associated with potential tissue damage. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of a combination of low dose ropivacaine with fentanyl and tramadol in epidural labour analgesia.Methods: This prospective randomized double blinded clinical study was conducted in 100 patients in labour after ethical committee approval. Inclusion criteria was patients who had ASA I and ASA II (American society of anesthesiologists physical status classification system), age above 18 years, height more than 150 cm, weight less than 110 kg, either primigravidae or gravid 2. Patients were allocated into two groups Group F (ropivacaine with fentanyl) and group T (ropivacaine with tramadol) by computer generated randomisation technique.Results: In the present study, mean age in group F (ropivacaine with fentanyl) was 22.54±2.5, mean age in group T (ropivacaine with tramadol) was 22.86±2.17, and weight in group F was 56.68±2.75 and group T was 56.58±2.58. Duration of labour in group F was 3.39±1.01 hrs and in group T was 3.42±0.70 hrs. There was no significant difference between the two groups at any time points for mean VAS score. There was no significant difference in the mean heart rate and arterial blood pressure among both the groups statistically (P>0.05). More side effects were seen in group F.Conclusions: Both fentanyl and tramadol in combination with ropivacaine provide similar analgesia with minimal motor block. Both have no adverse effects on cardiotocographic parameters. However side effects were relatively more common in fentanyl group. Thus tramadol is a safer alternative to fentanyl as an adjunct to epidural labour analgesia.

Investigating The Role Of Nf-Κb, Cox-1, Cox-2, Comt, Il-10, Il-6 And Tnf-Α In Modulating Anti-Nociceptive Activity Of Methanolic Extract Of Entada Phaseoloides

Objective: To investigate the analgesic activity of methanolic extract of Entada phaseoloides (MEEP) along with its molecular mechanistic pathway. Methods: Swiss albino female mice and Wistar rats of either sex were administered orally with MEEP extracts (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg) and pentazocine, tramadol and diclofenac sodium, as standard drugs. Following administration, anti-nociceptive activity was evaluated using an acetic acid-induced writhing test, Eddy’s hot plate, and hot water immersion test. Serum was collected for molecular expression of various proteins and genes using Reverse Transcriptase PCR and Western Blotting. Results: Acetic acid writhing test, a frequently used method to assess peripheral analgesic activity, revealed that MEEP reduced peripherally induced pain in a dose-dependent manner. Likewise, Eddy’s hot plate and hot water immersion methods, often implicated for testing central analgesic activities, showed that MEEP is bestowed with the capability to counteract analgesia in a dose and time-dependent manner. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and factors like COX-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and NF-κB that cause inflammatory responses and pain were significantly reduced, suggesting its analgesic and anti-inflammatory potential. This analgesic and the anti-inflammatory role played by MEEP is also supported by the up-regulation of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and COMT and COX-1 enzyme demonstrated no significant difference between the groups. Conclusion: The study revealed the weak peripheral and potent central analgesic property MEEP by modulating pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory pathways.

Comparative evaluation of caudal tramadol and fentanyl when mixed with bupivacaine in paediatric age group

Background: A caudal block is commonly performed block for postoperative analgesia pediatric surgeries. Duration can be enhanced by addition drugs like fentanyl, tramadol, clonidine midazolam etc to local anesthetics helps in decreasing the requirement of postoperative analgesics. This study was conducted to assess the analgesic efficacy of tramadol or fentanyl when mixed with bupivacaine in pediatric patients for surgeries below the umbilicus.Methods: Fifty children of ASA I and ASA status, between 2 to 12 years of age, of both sexes underwent elective surgeries below umbilicus were selected and randomly divided into groups of 25 each. One Group, T (n = 25) received 0.75 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine with tramadol 1mg/ kg and other Group F (n = 25) received 0.75 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine with Inj fentanyl 1μg/kg. Assessment of analgesia and any side effects after caudal injection to the first administration of analgesia were recorded for both the groups in next 24 hours following objective pain scores. Duration of analgesia and requirement of additional rescue analgesics was noted.Results: The Mean duration of analgesia recorded longer in Group T (18.26±6.1 hours) as compared to Group F (10.0+/- 2.68 hrs.) and no significant haemodynamic changes or adverse effect noted between 2 groups.Conclusions: Addition of tramadol, 1mg/kg to bupivacaine 0.25% for caudal anesthesia in children undergoing surgeries below umbilicus, enhances and prolongs postoperative analgesia compared to caudal fentanyl 1μg/kg and bupivacaine 0.25% alone.

Comparative study of diclofenac suppository with tramadol suppository in addition to acetaminophen for post caesarian analgesia

Background: Pain after emergency and elective caesarean section may adversely affect patient’s recovery and breastfeeding initiation. The aim of present study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of diclofenac suppository-intravenous acetaminophen (APAP) combination, tramadol suppository-intravenous APAP combination and intravenous APAP alone for postoperative pain relief after caesarean section.Methods: We designed a randomized double-blind control study. Three hundred parturient scheduled for caesarean section were randomized to receive diclofenac rectal suppository (100 mg), tramadol rectal suppository (100 mg) or glycerin rectal suppository in Group A, B and C respectively (100 parturient in each group). All the women routinely received 1000 mg acetaminophen intravenously. Assessment of pain was done using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 0, 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours. injection Pentazocine 0.3 mg/kg IV was given as rescue analgesia when VAS score > 30.Results: The mean VAS score was significantly higher in Group C as compared to Group A and Group B (p value < 0.001). This suggests better efficacy of multimodal treatment as compared to monotherapy. Group A as compared to Group B showed better efficacy in term of VAS score at 12 and 18 hours (p = 0.05, p = 0.02 respectively).Conclusions: We found that when controlling for socio-demographic characteristics, combination of either diclofenac or tramadol suppository with acetaminophen has significantly better results when compared with monotherapy of acetaminophen alone in post-operative analgesia after caesarean section. However, the combination of diclofenac suppository has proved to be superior in comparison to tramadol suppository.

Haemostatic Alterations after Sildenafil and Tramadol Administration in Rats

Haemostatic parameters constitute measurable indices in the haemostatic system used to assess the functionality of the coagulation system of an individual to establish a state of health or disorder. This studyevaluated haemostatic parameter such as platelets count, mean platelet volume (MPV), platelets distribution width (PDW), prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in 22 Male Albino Rats grouped and orally treated daily for three weeks with Sildenafil (4mg/200g.bwt), Tramadol(6mg/200g.bwt) and Sildenafil/Tramadol combination (4+6mg/220g.bwt). Rats were sacrificed by cardiac puncture and 5mls of blood collected for the analysis of the parameters using Sysmexhaematologyanalyser and Agape Diagnostic reagents kits. Results obtained shows a statistically significant increase in platelet count, PT and APTT compared with control across the various groups (p<0.05). A statistically significant decrease was observed in MPV, PDW inSildenafil+tramadol group, significant decrease in platelets distribution width for Tramadol group when compared with control (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed in the mean platelets volume and platelet distribution width in Sildenafil group. A comparison of Sildenafil+tramadol and Sildenafil groups shows no statistically significant difference in all the parameters analysed. There was also no significant difference in the mean platelets count, PDW, PT and APTT when Sildenafil+tramadol and Tramadol groups were compared (p<0.05). However, a statistically significant increase was seen in platelets count when Sildenafil+tramadol and tramadol were compared (p<0.05). Sildenafil and tramadol causes significant increase in platelets count, prolonged PT and APTT following single/combined daily administration in rats. Further research on these parameters, assessment of liver function, and measurement of intrinsic and extrinsic pathway coagulation factors in human taking this medication is recommended

To Evaluate the Effect of Ketorolac Tromethamine, Tramadol and Placebo During Periodontal Surgery: A Double Blind Study

Objectives: The efficacy of single oral dose KetorolacTromethamine, Tramadol and Placebo was evaluated in paincontrol after periodontal surgery.Materials and Methods: The study design is a split mouthstudy involving three quadrants of the same patient. 20patients requiring flap surgeries in at least three quadrantswere recorded. Patients were randomly divided into threegroups as per the medications given, either 10 mg ketorolac or50 mg tramadol or placebo tablets at least 30 minutes beforeadministration of local anesthesia (LA). The duration of surgeryfrom the time of incision to the placement of the last suture isrecorded. After the completion of the surgery, patients wereasked to rate their subjective operative pain intensity using avisual analog scale.Results: Differences were statistically significant in VAS scorebetween ketorolac and placebo, and tramadol and placebogroup. Comparison of sum of pain intensity showedsignificantly greater pain levels in the placebo than in theketorolac group and tramadol group.Conclusion: The results of this single-dose, parallel-group,and double blind placebo-controlled study showed that 10-mgketorolac and 50-mg tramadol administered immediately beforeperiodontal surgery was effective for better response by thepatient during the procedure. However, ketorolac and tramadolpremedication neither affected delayed pain levels, norpostoperative analgesic consumption.